Sunday, 1 January 2012

PRESS NOTE: Thousands gathered in Peoples' Public Hearing : Let Pinder River Flow Free 3-4-2011

People Vow to Oppose the Dam:

Let Pinder River Flow Free

Thousands gathered in Peoples' Public Hearing 3-4-11

"There is no place like our Pinder valley. What is Rs. 10- 20 lakhs to us? Have you ever thought about the lakhs worth of salt and grains that you have eaten from this land? I pray to all my friends, brothers and sisters to not join the company in turning this valley into a monstrosity!"These are the powerful words by Narmada Devi from Village Padmallah that marked the flavor of a peoples' public hearing on the Devsari HEP.

This public hearing on the 3 April 2011 saw a strength of 2000 people from all proposed Devsari HEP affected and surrounding villages of the pinder valley. The hearing was organized by Bhu Swami Sangharsh Samiti and Matu Jan Sangathan and took place at the Sangam Maidan of Block Deval, Tehsil Tharali, District Chomoli, Uttarakhand. Todays public hearing at Deval was a peoples' response to the project proponent hearing at Chepdu on 20 January 2011.


In Chepdu the project proponent SJVN declared the hearing successful even though the public was not allowed to enter, take stage or express their views, but were instead barricaded from the hearing area. To reclaim their right to a fair hearing, around 2000 people, mostly women from the different Gram Panchayats like Sunao, Suna, Dewalgwad, Tharali, Pthani, Silodi, Pengadh, Chepdu, Kail, Talor, Devsari, Purna, Sarkot, Garhkot, Cheranga talla, Lausri and many others attented the hearing with banners and slogans, demanding that the Pinder river flow free!] We want devlopment not distruction. Several groups marched in from various corners of the hearing ground, all shouting slogans and bearing banners, one group brought a black banner as a symbol of their opposition to the dam project. Women from Kail village brought two big traditional water pots filled with Pinder River water. Many villagers brought medicinal plants to show the biodivercity of the area. They emphasized that the Pinder is the only tributary of the Ganga that remains un-damed and they pledged to keep it so.

Mr. K. D. Mishra, founder member of Bhu Swami Sangharsh Samiti gave a warm welcome to all those at the hearing and began the proceedings!

Mr Dinesh Misra introduced the panel and explained the need for a peoples' public hearing. The esteemed panel consisted of Prof. Shekhar Pathak, Prof. Mehar Engineer, Prof. Sanjay Kumar, Prof. Sudha Vasan and Mr. Manoj Misra, and was welcomed by the local women who presented them with flowers and herbs from the Pindar valley. Prof. Mehar Engineer chaired the panel. People were invited to either speak to the panel or then hand in written submissions.

Madan Mishra compare the Peoples' "Public Heariing". First he invited Vimal Bhai of Matu Jansangathan to began the hearing. Who gave an outline of the Devsari HEP and history of all the public hearings held on the matter. He said, " The first public hearing at Tharali on 13 October 2010 was a sham. People were not informed of the process of the hearing, and sat in dharna and so it was suspended, while false charges of disruption were put on 10 people directly and anonymously on 60 people. Cases are still pending. The second hearing at Deval on 22 July 2010 had the police and administartion working together to do anything in their power to conduct a public hearing, even if it was false. Thus, people opposed the Public Hearing process, and their demands led to its' postponement. At the third public hearing at Chepdu on 22 January 2011, the project proponents paid people to speak in support of the dam, and others were barricaded away from the stage. On the 3rd of April, today. we are organising this peoples' public hearing so that those from affected areas can express their views on the project. We don't want the dam, so we don't want another public hearing, let Pinder River flow free!"

Mr Kundan Parihaar, from Sodhing village, spoke on the issue of employment in the region. He explained, "Since time immemorial whenever the policies of the government have tried to dispossess people of their livelihood, people have come together in strong protest. The protest against the British Forest Laws in 1917-18 and the Chipko Andolan are examples of this. Our forests will be affected and peoples' right over them will be affected. They will loose access to forest produce and will loose food security. The people engaged in collecting and selling sand, limestone used for whitewash, drift wood and catching fish from the river and the river bank will lose their source of livelihood. In actuality, dams don't provide sustainable employment, instead they snatch permanent sources of income."

Mr Dinesh Misra from Haat Kalyani spoke on Pinder Valley's cultural heritage. He said, "There are only two places according to Hindu mythology where the Bhramakapaal Shila stone can be found- Badrinath, and Deval. The Bhramakapaal Shila are sacred stones where people perform death rites. 'Pinder' means the pind, a place where death rites are performed. The sangam at Deval is the spot where pilgrims must bathe while on the Nanda Devi (goddess) Raajraat Yatra, also called the Maha Kumbh yatra (pilgrimage). This is the only north flowing tributary of the Ganga. We cannot allow this rich heritage to be destroyed."

Neema Behan from Phaldia declared that, "We need schools and teachers in schools, we need a bigger hospital, not a dam. We want development, not Destruction! People will be respected only when the dam is not built."

Ramchandra Uniyaal from Tharali said, "The SJVN has adopted the East India Company's tactics of divide and rule. They have created a divide! Amongst us there are families where elder brothers are against the dam, while the younger brothers are paid off by the company and they support the dam. The Government is promoting the 2013 Rajraar Yatra that takes place in the pinder valley, but it does nothing when asked why the project proponents are digging the mountains without any clearances. "

Rajendra Prasad Devradi from Soona said," The 17 km long proposed tunnel will pass 30 m below our villlage. In the event of an earthquake, since we are in Zone V, our houses will fall into this tunnel. Even our elected leaders in the state government are supporting the dam. When they come to your house for votes, kick them out!"

Bhairav Dutt from Village Poorna had an important point to make, he said "I have brought these local herbs to show you the rich herbal wealth of our region. These are expensive herbs used in a variety of medicines, and I picked them from the side of the road on my way here. Dam proponents claim that there are no medicinal plants in this area, this is completely untrue. The dam project will destroy all this and hence, I oppose it."

After an overwhelming response from the above mentioned, Nanda Devi; ex-block head of Deval, Ramchand Purohit, Pansingh Parihar, Mamata Shah, Heera Devi, Munni Devi, Mahipath Singh Kathaith, Maheshi Devi; block head of Tharali, Balwant Agri, Mahesh Trikoti, Bhopal Singh, Rakesh Devrani and Kedar Dutt Joshi, Pushpa Devi, Harish Panday, Balvant Singh form Silodi, Jashoda Devi, Mahvir Singh Bist, Surendra Parihar, Rajendra Singh from Pangarh, Hukam Singh, Kunwar Singh, Raghubir Singh and many others the panelists were asked to present their objective understanding of the testimonies.

Prof. Shekhar Pathak, Indian historian, writer and academician from Uttarakhand, spoke of the rich cultural heritage of the region, peoples' attachment to their homeland and the local sense of identity. He said that the preservation of their way of life and the conservation of the identity is the basis of this struggle. He added that while the government does not bring schools or hospitals for Pinder Valley's development, they are bringing a dam in the name of peoples' development.

Mr Manoj Misra, Ex-Chief Conservator of Forest, Chhatisgarh and now convenor of Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan, Delhi said that while enthusiasm and commitment to oppose the project were necessary, the awareness regarding the project must go hand in hand with it. Thus, the Pinder people should look to alternatives and the kind of future that they are demanding, in addition to their opposition to the dam.

Prof Sudha Vasan, Associate Professor of the Sociology Deparment, Delhi University, was greatly impressed by the quality of comments by women at the public hearing, which she said addressed the crux of the peoples' issues.

Prof Sanjay Kumar of St. Stephen's college, Delhi University, said that while people are given the right to vote in this country, money tends to influence our government, our policies, and our future. He thus said that this is a struggle of 20, 000 people against the might of money.

Prof Mehar Engineer, Ex-director, Basu Vigyan Mandir (Science College, Calcutta) and current Chairperson, Indian National Social Science Congress and Teachers and Scientists against Maldevelopment, spoke of similar struggles in Bengal. He explained that he was reminded of the small fishing village of Haripur, where people opposed the nuclear power plant proposed there.

The hearing ended in slogans of strength and unity, where people said that they will fight to keep the Pinder flowing freely and will not allow any dams on the river!

We will continue our struggle against the dam in the Pinder Valley!

Vimalbhai, Subhash Purohit, Surendra Singh, K.D. Mishra, Umesh Mishra, Madan Mishra, Dinesh Mishra

On behalf of



MATU JANSANGATHAN BHU- SWAMI SANGHARSH SAMITI


{DUU-63} Supreme Court Tehri Dam Case 30-3-2011

Supreme Court directs the State of Uttarakhand and THDC to sit together and resolve the issue of R& R.

Today in the Supreme Court heard the application of THDC wherein they have stated that land-slides which have occurred on account of raising the water level in the Reservoir and as a result thereof, rehabilitation of the affected families, is not covered by R&R. The THDC have also prayed for raising the water level upto 830 RL from the sea level. The Additional Solicitor General, Mr. Rawal pleaded for the THDC that the THDC has complied with all its obligations with regard to R&R and the Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand refuted the submissions made on behalf of the THDC and contended that the rehabilitation is not complete, the THDC has not provided funds and that the water level was raised to 832 RL during last monsoon September 2010 which was not only in violation of the guideline of Central Water Commission, but that the Court was also misled by the THDC in stating that if water is not stored in the reservoir, Haridwar and Rishikesh will be washed away. The State said that they are committed to complete the R&R at the earliest.

Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the statement of THDC that persons affected by the land-slide are not covered by the R& R is not only contrary to their earlier affidavits and stand taken in 2007 and 2008 but comparing the land slide affected persons with those affected by road building is extremely shocking, which shows not only insensitivity of THDC towards the people but is also in contempt of earlier directions of the Supreme Court. He emphasized that the Order dated 9.11.2010 should be complied with strictly.

The Honb’le Supreme Court observed that fight between the State Government and THDC, at the cost of affected persons, is unfortunate. They must know that any delay in rehabilitation will be affecting the life and properties of the people. The Hon’ble Court asserted that this blame game should stop and both THDC & State should meet at the earliest to resolve the differences. With the concurrence of the State and THDC, the Supreme Court has asked both to sit for discussion on 4th April in the Office of Rehabilitation Directorate, New Tehri. The Court has also asked the State of Uttarakhand and THDC to inform the result of discussion on the following Monday, ie. 11.04.2011. The case will be listed for further hearing on 11th April, 2011.

Matu Jansanghatan has always been keen that both the State and THDC instead of blaming each other and shifting the obligations should take affirmative actions in favour of the oustees. The stand of the THDC and the State that the land slides which occurred to the construction of the dam could not be foreseen is completely baseless, as the same was apprehended and was put in GSI Reports.

It is urged that if THDC wants to fill the reservoir, it needs to first take up the issue of R& R of all the affected people whether they are affected because of submergence or due to the land slides.

There are many issues related to Tehri Hyro-electic Project which are crucial, such as, stability of the green belt, Command Area Development Plan, water quality of Bhagirathi River after the construction of the Reservoir, Catchments Area Treatment plan, drinking water for the villages around the reservoir and in New Tehri.

Problem of Rural R& R sites are many which are to be taken into consideration, such as, land rights, other basic civic amenities including health facilities, education, roads, markets, electricity, transport facility, drinking water, irrigation etc. These issues also need to be discussed in this meeting.

The direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court should be taken as an opportunity by both the State and THDC to take a positive action to resolve the R& R issue rather than lingering it for the up-coming election.

Vimal Bhai

(Presented before the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30-3-2011}


{DUU-62} Ready to fight in Supreme Court as well 27-3-2011

Ready to fight in Supreme Court as well

NHPC challenged the NEAA order of quashing the

Kotli-Bhel-1B Environment Clearance

on 15th September 2010 National Environment Applet Authority in its order quash the environmental clearance dated 14th August 2007 of Kotli-Bhel 1-B HEP (195 MW) on River Alaknanda in Uttatrakhand. Although NEAA did not take account of many of issues raised by the pattitionors Dr. Bharat Jhunjhunwala, Vimal Bhai, Devki Devi, Sunder Singh Negi.

National Hydro Power Corporation, the project proponent has challenged the NEAA order in Supreme Court of India. People decide to fight the case too. Although the resistance on ground is their. NHPC used emergency clause 17 of Land acquisition Law. People refuse to take even the notice.

Many issues not taken into account by NEAA, some of then are given here ---

Existing landslides around the area are not fully enumerated; New landslides are not assessed; Basis of width of Green Belt around the reservoir is unclear; No provision has been made for acquiring private land Green Belt; Number of affected families is understated ; No ‘safety belt’ is provided along the rim; Loss of economic resources is understated; Impact of higher humidity and lower temperature on Malaria and Respiratory diseases is not given; the reservoir of Kotlibhel-1B will positively lead to the creation of at least one stagnant pond at Kandoli; Creation of slush along the reservoir rim is ignored; Deterioration of quality of water is ignored; Impact on butterflies and life cycle of local life forms not adequately assessed; Long run stream of costs and benefits is not assessed; EIA is prejudiced; Alternatives are not mentioned; NHPC is presenting this project as ‘run of river’ while actually it is designed as a storage project for creating peaking power; Dynamics of flow of water at Dev Prayag confluence is not disclosed. These submissions are against the project and prove that NHPC has wrongly stated that there was no opposition to the project.


Oprative part of order dated 15th September 2007 by NEAA:--

For the quantum of power production, in Kotlibhel- 1B, the displacement is very high. There is strong protest against parting of their houses and lands. The stretch runs through a populated area on which people perform rituals in flowing water. Being habitat for migratory fishes like Tor and Schizothorax spp, and the habitat for otter, the area is ecologically sensitive and with storage to a length of 27.5 Km it was found to affect the riverine ecology which cannot be compensated by declaring it a ‘restricted area’ or providing hatcheries. In the context of Srinagar project, there is need for a free flowing stretch for rejuvenation of river Alaknanda before it meets Bhagirathi at Deoprayag. This free flow will also help restoring the flow dynamics at Deoprayag which is affected by Kotlibhel-II. In short, river Alaknanda cannot afford to carry a project between Deoprayag and Srinagar. Overall there is also mass public resentment against the project which has not been considered by the EAC. Merely responding the representation of two persons is not sufficient.

Ministry’s Environment Clearance issued vide order J-122011/21/2007-IA.I dated 14th August 2007 to Kotlibhel Hydroelectric Project (Stage 1B) is hereby quashed. There will be no cost.